Saturday, August 20, 2011

Particle physicists chasing ghosts

Wispy neutrinos could explain why matter dominates the universeWeb edition : Friday, August 12th, 2011

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — Two experiments on different continents have found hints that particles called neutrinos can shape-shift in an unexpected way.

This behavior may be the key to understanding why these particles are so weird, says neutrino physicist Jennifer Raaf of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., the nation’s largest particle physics lab. Raaf presented an overview of recent neutrino findings August 9 at a meeting of the American Physical Society’s Division of Particles and Fields.

The new results also bode well for future experiments with neutrinos that may one day help scientists understand why the universe contains vastly more matter than antimatter. These experiments are part of the changing landscape of particle physics in the United States. With Fermilab’s Tevatron, once the most powerful particle collider in the world, shutting down soon, the government laboratory is reconfiguring itself to focus on projects that require particularly intense beams and look for extremely rare events.

“Neutrinos will play a big role moving forward,” says Young-Kee Kim, deputy director at Fermilab.

In the bestiary of particle physics, neutrinos are the neutral counterparts to the three charged leptons: the familiar electron and the heavier and more exotic muon and tau. Neutrinos are loners by nature, rarely interacting with the rest of the universe. But they do occasionally change form. That process, called oscillation, may offer clues about why the universe contains so little antimatter.

In June the T2K experiment in Japan reported evidence that muon neutrinos occasionally oscillate into electron neutrinos. Six electron neutrinos appeared in a nearly pure beam of muon neutrinos traveling from an accelerator at the J-PARC facility to an underground detector 295 kilometers away.

Days later, physicists at the MINOS experiment announced finding traces of this oscillation in neutrinos traveling 735 kilometers from Fermilab to a mine in Minnesota. Those results, presented August 9 at the physics meeting, help to narrow T2K’s estimate of how often this changeup happens.

Taken together, the chance that both sightings are flukes is less than one in a thousand, according to a recent analysis by a team of physicists in Italy and Germany. That’s below the standard for claiming a discovery but good enough to warrant further study, says Ed Kearns, a neutrino physicist at Boston University and T2K team member.

“This helps us justify future experiments,” he says. “It makes a big difference in our confidence going forward.”

If confirmed, this oscillation will be a crucial piece of information for a neutrino experiment now under construction at Fermilab. The NOvA experiment, which is currently testing its first prototype detector, could help scientists work out the differences in the masses of the different kinds of neutrinos, a long-standing puzzle.

Another project, called LBNE (for Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment), also hopes to extend this line of research. LBNE would send beams of neutrinos and antineutrinos from Fermilab to a detector 1,300 kilo?meters away, giving the particles more time to change identity — and the scientists a better shot at understanding whether neutrinos behave differently than their antimatter counterparts.

LBNE is still on the drawing board, though, and its future is clouded by uncertainties about funding. Last December, the National Science Foundation pulled out of a plan to build a laboratory in an old mine in South Dakota that would house not only a detector for the LBNE experiment but also a variety of other underground experiments. That decision ups the price tag for the Department of Energy, the experiment’s main funder. With the DOE’s budget uncertain, physicists are exploring different ways to try to lower the costs as much as possible.

“We’re expecting a clear decision about what’s right for LBNE by the end of this year,” William Brinkman, director of the DOE’s Office of Science, told a roomful of physicists during an August 11 forum at the physics meeting.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos and Matter & Energy

View the original article here

Friday, August 19, 2011

Book Review : BOOK REVIEW: The New Universe and the Human Future: How a Shared Cosmology Could Transform the World by Nancy Ellen Abrams and Joel R. Primack

By Nancy Ellen Abrams and Joel R. Primack access

Living only for the present, using up natural resources, polluting the environment without considering future generations — can humans ever change? Lawyer and popular-culture lecturer Abrams and her husband Primack, an astrophysicist noted for his work on dark matter, argue that people might, if only they learned a little cosmology.

Echoing the words of Joseph Campbell, who studied the myths of ancient and modern peoples, the authors argue that the world needs a modern understanding of human beginnings — a common story. The origin of the universe — with concepts such as the Big Bang, cosmic inflation, dark matter and dark energy — could become this overarching story for all humankind.

Abrams and Primack are careful to explain that they’re not discounting religion as a way for people to connect with each other and understand the meaning of the universe. But the authors believe that by understanding concepts of cosmology, a more global understanding of the human role in the cosmos will emerge.

“We need to feel in our bones that something much bigger is going on than our petty quarrels and our obsession with getting and spending, and that the role we each play in this very big something is what really defines the meaning and purpose of our lives,” they write.

The authors tell the cosmology story well and illustrate it with stunning images, in the book and online at www.new-universe.org. But it’s unclear whether a universal understanding of cosmic origins can ever take hold, since those who disagree may never pick up the book in the first place. 

Yale Univ. Press, 2011, 256 p., $28



View the original article here

Financial world dominated by a few deep pockets

Economic “superentity” controls more than one-third of global wealthWeb edition : Monday, August 15th, 2011 access POWER BALLA central core of extremely powerful actors (red dots) dominates international corporate finance, a new mathematical analysis finds.Vitali et al, 2011

Conventional wisdom says a few sticky, fat fingers control a disproportionate slice of the world economy’s pie. A new analysis suggests that the conventional wisdom is right on the money.

Diagramming the relationships between more than 43,000 corporations reveals a tightly connected core of top economic actors. In 2007, a mere 147 companies controlled nearly 40 percent of the monetary value of all transnational corporations, researchers report in a paper published online July 28 at arXiv.org.

“This is empirical evidence of what’s been understood anecdotally for years,” says information theorist Brandy Aven of the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh.

The analysis is a first effort to document the international web of relationships among companies and to examine who owns shares — and how many — in whom. Tapping into the financial information database Orbis, scientists from ETH Zurich in Switzerland examined transnational companies, which they defined as having at least 10 percent of their holdings in more than one country. Then the team looked at upstream and downstream connections, yielding a network of 600,508 economic actors connected through more than a million ownership ties.

This network takes on a bowtie shape, with a large number of diffuse actors in the wings and a few major players tangled up in the tie’s knot. So while it’s true that ownership of publicly held corporations is broadly distributed, says complex systems scientist James Glattfelder, a coauthor of the new work, “take a step back and it’s all flowing into the same few hands.”

While any man on the street may have predicted this outcome, the economic literature portrays markets as so dynamic that they lack hot spots of control, Glattfelder says.

Researchers aren’t sure what to make of the core’s interconnectedness. On the one hand, it could expose the whole network to risk.

“Imagine a disease spreading,” says Aven. “If you have a high school where everyone’s sleeping together and one person gets syphilis, then everyone gets syphilis.”

But on the flip side, she notes, interconnectedness can lead to better self-policing and positive behaviors, such as fair labor practices or environmentally friendly policies.

And even though the status of many players in the analysis has changed drastically since 2007 (now-defunct Lehman Brothers is a key element of the core), the analysis shows that ownership is becoming increasingly concentrated and increasingly transnational, says Gerald Davis of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

Because interpreting and analyzing these kinds of data is difficult, he says, the analysis serves more as “an impression of the moon’s surface you get with a telescope. It’s not a street map.”

Ownership can be difficult to study internationally because holding shares in a mutual fund doesn’t necessarily mean the same thing in the U.S. as it does in communist China. And even within a single country ownership can be hard to tease out, says economist Matthew Jackson of Stanford University. For example, when an individual invests in a mutual fund or even purchases shares through an institution like Merrill Lynch, the firm is often still the official owner of the assets. And even when shareholders do have voting rights, they may not exercise them.

“This becomes worrisome if everyone is like me and says I’ll let Vanguard do the voting,” says Jackson. “Maybe we should be a little bit worried. I don’t know if we should be.”


Found in: Numbers and Science & Society

View the original article here

Thursday, August 18, 2011

News in Brief: Earth & Environment

Methane from rice, killer fungus and more in this week’s news Web edition : Saturday, August 13th, 2011

Methane puzzle
After years of climbing, atmospheric concentrations of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, have held steady for nearly 30 years — and for reasons that have not been obvious. Using different data and methods, two new papers in the Aug. 11 Nature link the arrested growth in atmospheric methane with human activities. Chemical markers studied by one U.S. team suggest the plateau traces to a larger global drop in the combustion of fossil fuels during the 1980s than had been recognized. Another group, at the University of California, Irvine, linked much of the change instead to reduced methane emissions from rice production in Asia. —Janet Raloff

 Pumping groundwater raises sea level
The removal of groundwater for drinking, irrigation and other uses appears to have contributed more than 6 percent of the global sea level rise incurred since 1900, a new study finds. Leonard Konikow of the U.S. Geological Survey in Reston, Va., used data sources from around the world to show that over this time, groundwater extraction transferred some 4,500 cubic kilometers into the oceans. And the rate has increased since 1950 — and especially since 2000, when groundwater releases are estimated to have increased sea level some 0.40 millimeters per year. Konikow presents his analyses in a paper that will appear in Geophysical Research Letters. —Janet Raloff

Killer fungus caused extinction
A fungus may have contributed to the world’s great die-off some 250 million years ago. Paleontologists have puzzled over stringy-looking fossils called Reduviasporonites, which appear in rocks deposited worldwide during the mass extinction that ended the Permian period of geologic time. Now, scientists in the Netherlands, England and California suggest the fossils resemble modern-day soil fungi that include many plant pathogens. Fungi spreading through Permian-age plants may thus have helped kill off forests, the scientists proposed online in Geology on Aug. 5. —Alexandra Witze

Beyond Eyjafjallajökull
Europe had better be prepared for more volcanic ash clouds. Prompted by last year’s Eyjafjallajökull eruption in Iceland, a team including Graeme Swindles of the University of Leeds in England searched for signs of volcanic ash that had fallen across northern Europe in the last 7,000 years. Over the last millennium, the team found, ash clouds arrived on average around every 56 years. For any given decade the chance of an ashfall is 16 percent, the scientists reported August 5 in Geology. —Alexandra Witze


Found in: Earth and Environment

View the original article here

Issue for the week of August 27th, 2011

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Big fish return to Mexican marine park

access A 1.2-meter-long gulf grouper (Mycteroperca jordani) is among the large predators that have returned to Cabo Pulmo National Marine Park after a fishing ban.Octavio Aburto/iLCP

Within 14 years of a national marine park in Mexico’s Gulf of California closing its borders to fishing, the total mass of its denizens more than quintupled, a new study finds. Over the same period, the share of top predators — sentinels of a healthy ecosystem — also soared. Both trends countered those for fish in unprotected regions of the Gulf.

“People who object to marine protected areas, especially to strong protection like here, often say there is no proof that they work,” says Elliott Norse of the Marine Conservation Biology Institute in Bellevue, Wash., who was not involved in the new study. “Well, this is the proof.”

access A group of bigeye trevally (Caranx sexfasciatus) forms a spawning aggregation. Such populations have returned to the waters of the Cabo Pulmo National Marine Park after a fishing ban.Octavio Aburto/iLCP

The 71-square-kilometer Cabo Pulmo National Marine Park sits close to where the Gulf opens into the Pacific. Its coral reef makes it a tourist destination for diving and snorkeling. Since 1995, 35 percent of the park’s waters have been off limits to fishing, but local communities informally extended the no-take zone to the rest of the park, says Octavio Aburto-Oropeza of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif. He and his colleagues surveyed the reef’s fish populations in 1999 and again in 2009. They report the results of those surveys August 12 in PLoS ONE.

Fishers typically first target meaty predators such as giant groupers and snappers. Absent in 1999, such big fish — some a meter or more long — again inhabit Cabo Pulmo, Aburto-Oropeza says. He even witnessed Pacific tunas visiting to dine on the park’s reef fish.

Sharks remain notable for their virtual absence. Owing to heavy exploitation for the fin trade and slow rates of reproduction, this family of predators remains rare inside Cabo Pulmo and out, Aburto-Oropeza says.

Norse says there’s no reason to believe that the new study’s findings should prove unique to the Gulf of California. “I suspect that what they found would occur anywhere people who fish exercise the admirable restraint that the people have at Cabo Pulmo.”


Found in: Environment, Life and Science & Society

View the original article here

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Sparing the rare earths

access A potential shortage of several rare earth metals (some shown) has spurred research into technologies that don’t require them.Images-of-elements.com

The Toyota Prius isn’t exactly a muscle car. But the magnets under the hood certainly pack a punch.

Pound for pound, these permanent magnets are some of the most powerful on the planet. They generate fields 10 times stronger than those of typical refrigerator magnets, helping the hybrid car’s motor and generator to turn the wheels and charge the battery. The secret to the magnets’ intense fields? About three pounds of alloy made with rare earth elements.

Rare earths, 17 chemical elements found mostly in an appendage to the periodic table, have long been the darlings of solid-state physics and the electronics industry. Without these materials, hard drives wouldn’t be able to store so much information and smartphones wouldn’t be so pocket-friendly.

“Take away the small rare earth magnets inside the earbuds for your iPod, and you’re back to traditional-looking over-the-ear headphones,” says Alex King, director of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Ames Laboratory in Iowa.

But some people, particularly in the United States and Japan, have begun to worry about potential shortages in the supply of rare earths. Although the elements are not rare in themselves, they are concentrated in just a few locations. Last year, China produced about 97 percent of the rare earths mined on the planet. In recent years that country has been cutting back on the amount of rare earths it exports, reducing quotas by almost 40 percent in 2010.

Rising prices and a looming potential shortage have now ignited searches for alternatives to magnet technologies that chew up large amounts of rare earths.

access Rare indeedChina contains about half the world’s reserves of rare earth elements,and it far outstrips other countries in producing them from mining operations. SOURCE: USGSJanel Kiley

For some applications, rare earth elements may be simply irreplaceable. The phosphors used in color televisions and other displays with cathode-ray tubes get their brilliant reds from europium compounds. This rare earth’s electrons jump between energy levels and emit light in ways that can’t be mimicked by any other element in the periodic table.

Magnets, which account for about one-fifth of global rare earth consumption, may be a different story. With DOE funding, materials scientists in the United States are reviving the study of magnets, a field that hasn’t seen a major breakthrough in nearly three decades. Meanwhile, Japan — second only to China in global magnet production — has dedicated more than $150 million of its 2011 budget to research that would reduce its need for rare earths.

Some scientists plan to make the strongest rare earth magnets stronger with blends that use less of these materials. Others hope to ditch the elements in favor of common metals that might be good enough to get the job done.

“A lot of old problems in permanent magnetism are being revisited with new tools,” says Oliver Gutfleisch, a materials scientist who studies magnets at the Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research in Dresden, Germany. “We have to produce a next-generation magnet.”

Revisiting the iron age

The strength of a magnet — its ability to tug on iron — starts with its electrons. Every electron spins around its axis, like a planet or a figure skater. In most substances, electrons pair off, spinning in opposite directions. But some elements have unpaired electrons that spin in a way that makes their atoms into tiny bar magnets, with a north and a south pole. Expose a group of these atoms briefly to a magnetic field, and they line up with one another straight as soldiers, working together to make one big magnet.

access HYBRID VIGORView larger image | A vehicle such as the Toyota Prius contains rare earth elements throughout its various advanced technologies, including more than 20 pounds of lanthanum in the battery pack.© Owaki/Kulla/Corbis

Iron is one of the most magnetizable materials on Earth, but there’s a good reason why magnets aren’t usually made of pure iron. At the slightest provocation, such as a tiny electric field or change in temperature, iron’s atoms break rank and swing out of alignment, ruining the magnet. Iron is thus considered magnetically soft.

Metallurgist Iver Anderson, who spent years purifying rare earth metals in the crucibles of the Ames Laboratory, now hopes to harden soft iron alloys to create a magnet free of rare earths. The goal isn’t to make something that can rival today’s best magnets, just something with a better bottom line.

“For many applications, we don’t have to reach the same magnetic strength levels as rare earth magnets,” he says. “For hybrid cars, we need something maybe 50 percent or so as strong.”

Anderson and his colleagues plan to harden a blend of iron and cobalt by changing the shape of its crystal structure. The cube-shaped atomic lattices that make up iron cobalt give atoms too much freedom to wiggle around. Other crystal structures, such as hexagons and tetrahedrons, are better at keeping atoms in line, so “we’re trying to figure out a way to distort the cubic structure and make it tetrahedral,” says Anderson. Computer simulations he presented at an Energy Department meeting in May suggest that this goal could be achieved by peppering the usual iron cobalt recipe with other atoms: tungsten, maybe, or nitrogen.

The Ames team is also dusting off “alnico” magnets, commercialized in the 1940s. Made mostly of aluminum, nickel, cobalt and iron, these magnets are reasonably hard but only about one-fifth as strong as the best rare earth magnets. Tweaking the structure of these magnets to line up the iron cobalt grains might up the oomph.

“We’re at least a year away from knowing whether this will work,” Anderson says. “Whether it makes sense from an economic standpoint is another step beyond that.”

access What rare earth elements are good for

Another scientist who wants to work with magnets from the iron age is Migaku Takahashi of Tohoku University in Japan. He is experimenting with combinations of iron and nitrogen because thin films made out of these elements are the most magnetizable material known. In March, Takahashi’s collaboration announced a method to create powders that retain this property, though they still lack the hardness needed to be useful for rare earth–free magnets.  Like Anderson, Takahashi is taking the long view; he doesn’t expect to be able to make a commercial magnet out of this material until at least 2023.

Rare attraction

Uncertain that these well-explored traditional materials will yield new surprises anytime soon, Ames scientists and other groups are trying to reinvent rare earth magnets from the bottom up.

The best rare earth magnets used today date to 1983, when scientists at General Motors and the Sumitomo Special Metals Co. in Japan independently created the first alloy of iron, boron and the rare earth metal neodymium. This breakthrough was driven by economics; the best magnets at the time were made of cobalt and the rare earth samarium, and the price of cobalt was rising rapidly.

Adding neodymium atoms smothers some of the iron’s magnetic strength but greatly improves its ability to resist demagnetization. Neodymium magnets can achieve about 56 megagauss-oersteds, or MGOe, a unit of magnetic field strength. That compares with more than 10 MGOe for the best non–rare earth magnets, and less than 5 MGOe for the stuff used in refrigerator magnets.

“It’s hard to imagine making a more perfect magnetic material than neodymium-boron-iron,” says George Hadjipanayis, a materials scientist at the University of Delaware in Newark, whose research was crucial to the invention of the first neodymium magnets.

access POWER UPView larger image | Magnets containing rare earth elements, such as neodymium and samarium, achieve far higher measures of magnetic field strength than older magnets based on iron alloys.O. Gutfleisch et al/Advanced Materials 2011

Confident that no single material could do a better job, Hadjipanayis and his colleagues have turned to composite neodymium magnets. The researchers are grinding magnetically hard and soft materials into pellets and trying to bind them like candies stuck in a ball. The soft stuff, perhaps iron cobalt, should boost the magnet’s pull. The hard stuff, rare earth compounds, should preserve the strength.

For the materials to play well together, though, these pellets must be extremely small, small enough to qualify as a “nanocomposite” material. When hard chunks and soft chunks are arranged in a kind of patchwork quilt, the hard bits stay connected over distance by the equivalent of magnetic springs. If stretched too far over the soft bits, the springs snap, and the nanocomposite stops behaving as a single material.

A magnet structured as a nanocomposite could achieve some 120 MGOe — more than twice as strong as anything on the market today, according to calculations published in 1993 by Ralph Skomski and Michael Coey of Trinity College Dublin. It would also use significantly less rare earth material.

“Nanocomposite magnets are the holy grail for rare earth magnets,” says John Burba, executive vice president and chief technology officer at Molycorp Minerals in Greenwood Village, Colo.

New teamwork

Thanks to advances in nanotechnology in the years since nanocomposites were first proposed, Hadjipanayis’ team can now create suitably tiny and uniform bits of hard and soft magnetic materials — while also preventing oxygen from damaging their surfaces, a key problem in making nanocomposite magnets. So can a team at General Electric’s Global Research Center in Niskayuna, N.Y.

GE is pursuing nanocomposite magnets because it’s the largest manufacturer of wind turbines in the United States. New turbine designs incorporate huge magnets that can better handle fluctuations in wind speed and provide more torque than older designs. But a turbine capable of powering about 2,400 homes uses as much as a ton and a half of rare earth permanent magnets.

Last year, in response to a steep increase in the price of the metal rhenium (which is not a rare earth), GE scientists made a very strong replacement “superalloy” out of very small grains of nickel. Using techniques similar to those developed for that and other work, the researchers now aim to improve the strength of rare earth magnets by about 40 percent while decreasing the amount of rare earths in the magnets by 80 percent. What these magnets will be made of, though, is still anyone’s guess.

“We’re exploring several different hard and soft materials but haven’t selected a specific chemistry yet,” says materials scientist Frank Johnson of GE.

Choosing the right stuff for a nanocomposite isn’t easy. In 2002, physicist Ping Liu, now at the University of Texas at Arlington, and colleagues published a paper in Nature describing experiments that mixed magnetically hard and soft particles made of iron and platinum. His team fused the particles, and the resulting magnetic fields were more than 50 percent stronger than the hard material on its own.

But Liu hasn’t figured out how to get all of the grains lined up before fusing, which would allow the nanocomposite to reach its full potential. And the platinum may make this approach too expensive to be viable for everyday magnets.

Dyspros and cons

If they ever live up to their promise, nanocomposite magnets should reduce the demand for both neodymium and for another rare earth element called dysprosium.

Dysprosium hardens magnets against heat by reshaping their magnetic fields. Every neodymium magnet intended for a hybrid car, a wind turbine or another application in which temperatures soar to hundreds of degrees must be spiked with a bit of the pricey dysprosium. It costs more than seven times as much as neodymium and is currently mined in only one place in the world: clays in southern China. So some researchers are exploring pragmatic ways to cut down on its use.

Changing the microstructures of magnets could help, as neodymium magnets made of smaller grains are naturally more resistant to demagnetization. Working with the magnet company Intermetallics, materials scientist Satoshi Sugimoto of Tohoku University and colleagues recently developed fine-grained magnets that require 40 percent less dysprosium.

The best fine-grained magnets completely free of dysprosium may belong to Kazuhiro Hono, a researcher at the National Institute for Materials Science in Tsukuba, Japan, and colleagues. These magnets, to be described in September in Scripta Materialia, are 60 percent more resistant to demagnetization than commercial neodymium magnets that lack dysprosium. But Hono’s magnets are still not quite good enough for cars and wind turbines.

Despite recent advances, neither Japan nor the United States appears to be counting on magnet breakthroughs anytime soon. Geologists from the University of Tokyo and their colleagues recently proposed dredging the Pacific Ocean for rare earths (SN: 8/13/11, p. 14). Several Japanese companies have also started “urban mining” programs meant to reclaim the rare earths buried in cell phones and other devices. Hitachi is working to reclaim 80 percent of the rare earths from the magnets of discarded hard drives and air conditioners.

In the United States, Molycorp Minerals has reopened a mine on the edge of California’s Mojave Desert that was once a profitable source of europium and cerium. Last year, the company began processing previously mined ore for rare earths, including neodymium.

But these efforts to dig out of a difficult situation may not prove economical, and the combined creativity of scientists on both sides of the Pacific may fall short. So Toyota has launched a program to rid its cars altogether of permanent magnets —  rare earth or not — by developing a new motor that would run on electromagnets, which generate fields by passing current through coils of wires and have traditionally been considered too bulky for hybrid and electric cars.

If Toyota engineers succeed, these new motors could push forward the next generation of hybrid vehicles without the need for any rare earths.


Found in: Chemistry, Earth, Matter & Energy, Science & Society and Technology

View the original article here